The new face of science basing on computer simulations.
Will computer simulations reveal a new face of science? In the last century, mathematical calculations were the basis of scientific activity. These calculations were performed with pen and paper. Since the dawn of the Information Age, scientists have increasingly turned to tools such as computers. Computers are becoming useful in many scientific fields. However, computers do not meet our excessive demands — all we can get from computers are approximations (Scientific modelling). Our approximations obtained in the process of computer operations are becoming more accurate, which allows us to generate promising computer simulations.
A quantum computer is a (real or theoretical) computer that uses quantum mechanical phenomena in an essential way: it exploits superposed and entangled states, and the intrinsically non-deterministic outcomes of quantum measurements, as features of its computation. Quantum computers can be viewed as sampling from quantum systems that evolve in ways classically described as operating on an enormous number of possibilities simultaneously, though still subject to strict computational constraints.
By contrast, ordinary ("classical") computers operate according to deterministic rules. Any classical computer can, in principle, be replicated by a (classical) mechanical device such as a Turing machine, with only polynomial overhead in time. Quantum computers, on the other hand are believed to require exponentially more resources to simulate classically. It is widely believed that a scalable quantum computer could perform some calculations exponentially faster than any classical computer. Theoretically, a large-scale Quantum computer could break some widely used public-key cryptographic schemes and aid physicists in performing physical simulations.
The basic unit of information in quantum computing, the qubit (or "quantum bit"), serves the same function as the bit in ordinary or "classical" computing. However, unlike a classical bit, which can be in one of two states (a binary), a qubit can exist in a linear combination of two states known as a quantum superposition. The result of measuring a qubit is one of the two states given by a probabilistic rule. If a quantum computer manipulates the qubit in a particular way, wave interference effects amplify probability of the desired measurement result. The design of quantum algorithms involves creating procedures that allow a quantum computer to perform this amplification.
According to our Concept — ToE–Quantum Space, the Universe is an illusion that represents information — we have called this information “Primary Information.” Later in this article, we will present our views in more detail. For now, however, we invite you to read the cited article, which indirectly refers to the information contained in our views. It seems that if we have the enormous Computer performance of quantum computers at our disposal, we may also try to simulate other models of our Universe.
Source: https://www.quantamagazine.org/analog-vs-digital-the-race-is-on-to-simulate-our-quantum-universe-20250905/?mc_cid=84caf56ebb&mc_eid=386c697863
It seems that for quantum computers it is possible to organize a process for computer simulations for any phenomena occurring in our Universe. This means that we could theoretically find out what could exist inside black holes. This kind of particularistic information could give a complete picture of our Universe. We could also, thanks to such simulations, answer the question: how our Universe was created. However, there is still a long way to go at this technological stage. It seems that this will be the new face of science.
The new face of science - according to our concept
According to our concept of Quantum Space, Information plays a key role in the creation of our Universe. This means that future computer systems may try to map quite accurately the first moment of our Universe's existence. For this to be possible, we still need to develop quantum computer technology. Such computer simulations require enormous resources and Computer performance.
We do not know this for certain, but let us assume that our universe could have been created according to the Big Bang Theory. The problem that remains to be solved is the beginning of the universe. How did the universe begin? The Big Bang Theory focuses on energy. Energy was the primary entity. According to our concept of Quantum Space, information was at the beginning of the Universe. Time, space, energy and matter constituted an informational unity. First, time was released, then space, and finally energy and matter. According to the Big Bang Theory, the main problem to be solved is describing the first moments of the universe’s existence..
Existing theories of physics cannot tell us about the moment of the Big Bang. Extrapolation of the expansion of the universe backwards in time using only classical general relativity yields a gravitational singularity with infinite density and temperature at a finite time in the past. However this classical gravitational theory is expected to be inadequate to describe physics under these conditions. Thus the meaning of this singularity in the context of the Big Bang is unclear.
The earliest time that general relativity can be applied is called the Planck time. Earlier, during the Planck epoch, when the temperature of the universe was close to the Planck scale (around 1032K or 1028eV) quantum gravity effects are expected to be dominant. To date there is no accepted theory of quantum gravity; above the Planck energy scale, undiscovered physics could influence the expansion history of the universe. This raises the question: how should we interpret the Initial Singularity, which marks the beginning of the universe, if such a beginning ever occurred?
So, do we know how to estimate what class of future horsepower computer will be needed to analyze the Universe? According to our Concept — ToE–Quantum Space, we assume that everything is Information. In other words, every phenomenon can be described effectively by information from our point of view. Of course, we do not have data about the beginning of our Universe, but Primary Information seems to be crucial.
If the Universe had a Beginning, then such a Beginning would be quite Singular. First, everything that could have happened in the first moments had to be consistent with the entire passage of time, as we assume today — the age of our existence. Such a description would also have to be consistent with our present moment. Perhaps the description of Reality at that first moment underwent a certain transformation, but it had to be consistent with our Here and Now. Therefore, if there was a Beginning of the Universe, the description had to be made through Information — this was Primary Information.
Our Concept — ToE–Quantum Space assumes the existence of a Quantum Space structure that very much resembles a huge computer. The structure of Quantum Space contains data. This data depicts every moment of the existence of our Universe and in alternative scenarios. This seems to be a very comfortable situation for computer simulations.
The new face of science - Different concept of time
If we overcome the technological barriers to quantum computers, computer simulations for any phenomena are very possible. This means that we could theoretically find out what could exist inside black holes. This kind of particularistic information could give a complete picture of our Universe. We could also, thanks to such simulations, answer the question: how our Universe was created. Will this be the new face of science.
Well, according to our Concept — ToE–Quantum Space, inside a black hole there is information gathered from the beginning of our Universe to the moment of its end. The question is, can this information be useful? What if the information inside a black hole tends toward a single state of the Universe — toward a description of the first moment of our Universe’s existence? Could it be that in the first moment of existence, it was possible to exist without basic attributes: without time, without space, without energy and without matter? Perhaps at that time there was only unity, a mysterious bond between time, space, energy and matter.
If the first moment described by Primary Information presented an interpretation of the unification of time, space, energy and matter, then this description must converge to a single point—the moment of the first Primary Information. Therefore, if our Universe has a Beginning and an End, then according to our Concept — ToE–Quantum Space, the Primary Information for the First and Last Moments are convergently the same — even though their values are different. This means that the sequence for the End of the Universe must converge to a single value. This value appears to be the same, although in reality they are not equal.
Entropy is central to the second law of thermodynamics, which states that the entropy of an isolated system left to spontaneous evolution cannot decrease with time. As a result, isolated systems evolve toward thermodynamic equilibrium, where the entropy is highest. A consequence of the second law of thermodynamics is that certain processes are irreversible.
Geometry for relativity theory can play a key role for our concept of gravity. Does this mean that today’s mathematical models based on geometry will have an impact on the development of what Albert Einstein started? We don’t know exactly how geometry will change if our concept of time changes.
Quantum Mechanics has its own rules. One of the rules is the uncertainty principle. It seems that the indeterminacy principle must have different rules for the concept of time – time at the quantum level functions quite differently. This means that the concept of time in quantum mechanics can usefully introduce a different description of phenomena at the quantum level. If that were the case, then we would also have to factor in macro-scale phenomena.
In order for a feature, an attribute of the Universe to appear, which will enable the description of our Universe using laws, information must first appear. Information was the first trigger for subsequent features of the Universe, which can be used to describe our Universe. It was information that united four attributes: time, space, energy and matter. Information originally had to be some form of energy of a type unknown to us. Only then, were the individual attributes of the description of our Universe released from information. The first attribute to be released was time.
At the beginning of everything there had to be Information.
It seems that the origin of our Universe must have been consistent and coherent. This means that what was primordial – at the beginning of our Universe, must be consistent with our current perception of the Reality around us. Something that once began must be consistent and coherent with today’s picture of our Reality. If it were not, our Reality would be unstable, to say the least. It all boils down to one thing – at the beginning of our existence there could have been Information (Primary Information). It was information that gave rise to everything. The only question that remains is. In what form could such information have appeared at the beginning.
Our concept of time takes into account our ToE-Quantum Space. The concept of Quantum Space incorporates a new approach to the concept of „time” – this was discussed in the ToE-time concept. The new concept of time assumes that our concept of time in our surrounding Reality, is an incomplete concept. Therefore, a new interpretation of time has been proposed – this is the concept of expanded time. Extended time has been described by a complex time function. This means that our time has a completely different dimension, so „time” must be described in a completely different way. The mathematical description of time was made using the Time Quaternion.
The above examples of scientific research can also apply to our concept of „Time”. This means that „time” must not have existed before the Big Bang, if the age of the Universe is finite, then it must have started at some point. This is especially important for the process of observing distant objects – distant in both time and distance. See more information in article Observing the visible Universe and Observation rights.
To understand the Universe and its creation according to the interpretation of our Concept – ToE-Quantum Space, it is necessary to know our concept of time, interpretation of gravity and interpretation of matter. However, everything started with the concept of the emergence of Quantum Space.
According to our conception, “time” does not exist, and if it does, then perhaps gravity has a completely different meaning as well. This led us to our concept of the Theory of Everything.
My interpretation of the Universe – The Theory of Everything is not a single mathematical formula, nor is it a way to combine several other theories, nor is it a proof of the connection between gravity and quantum mechanics – so what is QST? Quantum Space Theory is an energy state that can express every possibility, every quantum of time – everything.
Imagine a Theory of Everything – EVERYTHING. A theory that explains what is TIME, the COORDINATE of space, taste, hair color, the movement of planets, the Big Bang, Parallel Worlds and explains all your choices. A theory that explains why you have dreams and, at the same time, how matter was created. A theory that does not exclude what we know, what we have come to know but perhaps looks at things a little differently.
A theory that takes into account philosophy, mathematics, physics – Everything. A theory that bridges the worlds of physics and metaphysics. The theory that starts from wherever your perception, experience and imagination apply. You can’t go deeper, we are at the limits of abstraction.
It is an energy state that maps time, space, matter, the Universe…. and at any point in time – So does „time” exist? It is impossible to prove certain phenomena, we have problems with both the micro-world and the macro-world, what we present here is the boundary between Knowledge and Philosophy. Some claim that everything began with the Big Bang – we do not dispute this, but we look at it differently.
Komentarze
Prześlij komentarz