Root cause

Root cause. It seems that the current data we have received from the James Webb Space Telescope is creating a huge confusion that could undermine the Big Bang Theory, at least part of it (see the link). This means that our thinking about the Big Bang concept needs to be remodeled, and if so, perhaps the Big Bang is not entirely consistent with what we are getting from the Webb's telescope. So does this mean that our thinking about the Expansion of our Universe must undergo some modification? What about our Root Cause - the Initial Singularity?

The Root Cause - the "Initial Singularity" according to the Big Bang Theory had to exist for our Universe to appear, this element must be necessary for the expansion of the Universe. It is assumed that there was no "time" before the Big Bang, this means that "time" began to pass after the occurrence of the Initial Singularity. If this could have been the case, then time cannot exist without the "Initial Singularity", and this means that "time", our Universe must be in the territory of the "Initial Singularity". This means that our Universe could not exist without the Root Cause -  "Initial Singularity".

The concept of the Root Cause. If our Universe cannot exist without the Root Cause - the Initial Singularity, this means that the Expansion of our Universe must take place within this Root Cause.

So does the Expansion of our Universe look completely different? If the Expansion of our Universe takes place inside the "Initial Singularity", then our "Time" has a finite value. If we assume that the "Initial Singularity" can correspond to a sphere, then our "Time" must have a finite value. This means that "time will end" when it reaches a point in the center of the sphere. Why? Because our "time" is in line with the direction of the Expansion of our Universe. We are only viewing information from the past.

Going further, if our Universe cannot exist without the "Initial Singularity," then the expansion of our Universe is done in a completely different way. The direction of expansion of the Universe would then be from the outer boundary of the sphere (the Initial Singularity) to the central Point of the sphere - this means that time has a finite value. But. If this is the case, and if the Initial Singularity expands as our Universe expands, then ... means that our "time" is slowing down.

The slowing down of time is accomplished the closer we are to the center of the sphere. The further we are from the center of the sphere, the "time" rushes faster. Therefore, the galaxies we observe are closer to the boundary of the sphere and run away faster.

All this can mean that our "time" will start to slow down to zero until it reaches the center point of the "Initial Singularity" - this means that there is no change in the center point, which is a sign of the passage of time. Everything is moving towards one point - the end of time, this can be interpreted as the heat death of the universe (the disappearance of all change).

The last point - the direction of the expansion of the universe. The Initial Singularity must contain complete information on the origin of the Universe, the Scientific law, matter, time, space. This means that the Initial Singularity has a definite plan for phenomena in the Micro-World and phenomena in the Macro-World. I am unable to imagine if the Initial Singularity did not have plans for the end of times.

The end of our Times must also be in the territory of the Initial Singularity. This means that we have many ideas, but we are all heading in one direction. Perhaps each Universe may have a different dimension, a different time, but eventually it will reach a common point - the center of the sphere of the Initial Singularity.

We do not know what was the Root Cause in the act of creation of our Universe. In the Big Bang Theory, the Root Cause was referred to as the "Initial Singularity." - this is a rather undefined concept. According to our Concept of Quantum Space, the Initial Singularity is a certain representation of an energetic state - it is the environment in which the Act of Creation known in the image of the Universe could have taken place in a favorable way. Does this mean that our Universe had its unknown version? This we do not know.

Marek Ożarowski