The first information that appeared in the description of our Universe
The first information that appeared in the description of our Universe must have concerned the description of the state at the first moment of existence. If our Universe had a beginning, then it seems that the first information (Primary Information) that could have appeared was the information about the creation of our Universe. Then, the first moment of existence must have represented the state — the state of creation of everything. This is only a simplification and an imagining of what could have occurred at the moment of our Universe's inception.
So, is Information the first attribute that described the creation of our Universe? In that case, such information would be a description of the first moment of existence. Yes, information would have to be primary information, from which everything began. Information could be a consistent continuation that defines and describes our expansion. It was primary information that had to transform from a description of the first moment to a description of our present Reality.

The first moment in the existence of our Universe must have been special. At that time, time did not yet exist, space did not yet exist, and neither energy nor matter existed. Therefore, it is highly probable that at the very beginning of our Universe's existence, only Information appeared – the First Information (Primary Information) about the creation of a being – our Universe. Even if the Universe is born and collapses – that is, it functions in cycles, it is cyclical – in this model, it is possible to determine the Beginning and End of the Universe for a single cycle. Each successive Universe will have its own beginning and end.
This means that the Universe lasts forever – eternally. However, if we experience and observe the phenomenon of the expansion of the Universe, then in this case too, we can imagine a model of the existence of a cyclical Universe, like a circle. The beginning and the end are one common point, where one version of the Universe ends and the next version of the Universe begins. Everything between these points is our existence, which follows the direction of expansion.

Many theories concerning the origin of the Universe – for example, the Big Bang theory – assume that at the very beginning, energy was the fundamental attribute. Energy is the image of birth, of an explosion that released the Universe and transforms it through expansion. From the point of view of thermodynamics, some forms of energy are state functions and thermodynamic potentials. Energy and its changes describe the state and interactions of physical objects (bodies, fields, particles, physical systems), physical and chemical transformations, and all kinds of processes occurring in nature. In thermodynamics, energy that can be converted into work under certain conditions is called free energy.
Can First Information be Energy?
Why would Energy be the basic attribute? Like information, energy needs a source. The source of energy is essential for generating energy itself. So why would Energy be the basic attribute at the moment of our Universe's creation? It seems that for generations, scientists have claimed that Energy was the indisputable, Primary form of existence. I am able to accept this view on the condition that such energy would be energy of an unknown type. Maybe such energy would be the equivalent the dark energy?
Such Energy of an unknown type would be a source, a frame of reference, and an observer all at once. It is something that could exist outside of time and space. It is something that could be an environment for itself and for other “beings” at the same time. To understand this, an analogy would be helpful. Such Energy would be similar to the concept of Ether – a historical term rejected by modern science, which defined the entity (matter, medium, element) in which electromagnetic waves, including light, were supposed to propagate.
Old-school physicists from the last century couldn't imagine that our universe could be like a big computer simulation. That's why the energy from the Big Bang theory was understood as our concept of energy — an unknown type. But what if this Unknown Energy is identified with Information? Could our Universe have been “born” from Information – Primary Information? In that case, the Big Bang could have concerned Information, not energy. Information could have been the key building block in the first moments of our existence. It is just a matter of proper interpretation.

Today's knowledge and mathematical apparatus provide us with a logical sequence of proofs that aim to describe the reality around us in an unambiguous, consistent, and logical way. Proof is a strict justification of a given statement, following established rules. Only after presenting a correct proof do mathematicians call statements describing certain properties of objects “theorems.” Thus, a theorem is a statement of a given mathematical theory that has a proof.
So, is such a description possible from the point of view of the first moment of our Universe's existence? What could be a logical and consistent combination of mathematical descriptions then and now? The point is that if something happened at the first moment of our Universe's creation, then, like mathematical proof, that something could be described unambiguously and consistently in an adequate manner, as we do today.
Such a mathematical description could be difficult, because at the first moment of our Universe's existence, there was neither time, nor space, nor energy as we know it today, nor was there any matter – which means that there are neither the Scientific laws nor the mathematical apparatus to describe it. Perhaps it is impossible to describe our Universe from the first moment, if at that moment no “thing” survived that has its continuation today or is a consequence of that moment today. There must be a consistent description of Reality for the first moment and for our present moment.
First Information – content of the message
Therefore, if our Universe had a Beginning, our Concept — ToE–Quantum Space assumes that in the first moment of our Universe, Information existed – Primary Information. This Primary Information described the state of the Universe in its first moment. The Primary Information describes the state of the Universe that corresponds to the current Reality. So if this was the first moment of our Universe's existence, then the record of the Primary Information took the form of a function – the Primary Information function denoted by Info(TN).

The content of the First Primary Information was intended for subsequent Primary Information. We do not know what the content of the First Primary Information was – it was probably a way of multiplying subsequent Primary Information (multiplying changes). This means that the Transfer of Information took place in the first moments to subsequent Primary Information. In order to accurately describe the current Reality – in our case, the first moment of the Universe's existence – there is no need for huge amounts of data to be contained in the Primary Information.

It seems that the First Primary Information could have contained instructions for the formation of the first moments of our Universe's existence. The data necessary to describe that first moment may not have been much compared to the present moment in which we currently exist – in our Here and our Now. More data must appear to describe subsequent moments in order to describe more phenomena that determine subsequent sequences. This means that in order to describe the Basic Attributes, which may already be understandable to us with the right interpretation, much more Primary Information is necessary.
At the beginning of our Universe, there must have been Primary Information – the first information describing the birth of our Universe. Analogous to our experience, it could have been Primary Information – alpha information, which could have resembled a message: “Hello, I am the Universe and I have just been born, I am announcing this to everyone around me” – if any “everyone else” existed in general.
Marek Ożarowski
Komentarze
Prześlij komentarz