Earth has existed some 4.5 billion years, almost as long as our solar system. What kind of observations can an observer from Earth hope for when observing an object that emitted its existence 13 billion years ago? When information about such an object was sent out, our Earth did not yet exist. So what do we see, or a complete kind of illusion? Is the information we interpret during observation reliable? It seems to be a one-way street. That is, it is a one-way observation - the information comes from the edges of our Universe, from the edges of the outer layers of the Initial Singularity.
One-way observation. The process of observing very distant objects in time and distance is done according to the Law, which enforces the direction of observation for such objects. Observation of such objects is done in the direction of the expansion of the Universe. This means that the observer is always directed in the direction of the "Beginning" of the creation of our Universe - no matter what very distant object he is viewing in outer space this observation comes from the direction of the outer sphere of the "Initial Singularity".
The observed object must have radiated energy in accordance with the direction of expansion of the Universe. Then this energy in the form of radiation (light) was emitted before the formation of the Earth. If our solar system is 4.6 billion years old, then the difference in time is about 9.2 billion years. So what is the process of observing objects that were created much earlier than our Earth was born?
If we observe an object that was created 13 billion years ago, and our Earth is more than 4.5 billion years old, all the information that reaches us from such a distant object in time and distance may be "distorted". This does not mean that such an object did not exist - it existed for that Here and that Now. The light that carried the information about this distant object must have reached us along with the direction of expansion of our visible Universe. Otherwise, such information could not have reached us. This means that the directional observation must have its justification. Is it a one-way observation? Perhaps that's why our "time" is one-way?
Marek Ożarowski
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz