In a previous post, we started a discussion on the Age of the Universe. We now have no certainties regarding all that has been observed, discovered over the last 100 years. The time has come to verify all the theoretical assumptions, all the postulates that have gained recognition in the scientific world. Now, we are slowly learning to verify this knowledge.
We have at our disposal much greater capabilities than our predecessors - the James Webb Space Telescope, the Large Hadron Collider. Our predecessors could only dream and such possibilities, but they are the ones who started this discussion - How old can the Universe be. Here are maybe a few quotes.
We are unable to resolve how old our Universe is. We try to explain it by observing the Cosmic microwave background. Undoubtedly, the age of our Universe will allow us to understand what "time" is and how the concept of "time" can be interpreted. The interpretation of "time" will also allow us to answer the question of whether our "time" has expanded.
Observations of the distant, and therefore early, Universe show giant black holes with masses of billions of solar masses. This raises the question, how could they have formed, if, according to current theory, it takes a long time to do so? Such objects arise from smaller black holes into which surrounding matter flows, or other black holes fall. So we are dealing with a huge enigma.
Perhaps, however, we should look for solutions other than the aging of the Universe. I suspect that such a radical hypothesis would have numerous implications, such as for the Cosmic microwave background or many other observations. We now have a truly consensus picture of the Universe and its evolution. It's true that cracks appear on it from time to time, but perhaps we don't need a revolution to get rid of them.
... the key to knowing the Age of the Universe is to study how it expands.
https://tech.wp.pl/naukowcy-watpia-w-wiek-wszechswiata-moze-byc-dwa-razy-starszy,6931450669439904a
This means that, according to our Theory of Everything (ToE), we also take into account the expansion of "time". So far, only the expansion of "Space" has been talked about - the Big Bang theory assumes just such a model, a model of the expansion of the Universe based on "Space". So, if at the beginning before the Big Bang all "Space" and matter were interpreted as a singularity - that is, concentrated in one point, then what was happening in "time". Can't "time" also be interpreted as some kind of "singularity"? Then "time" could also be subject to expansion. And this could mean a "revolution" in the perception of our Universe.
Perhaps our concept of Quantum Space is able to explain the expansion of "time" - but it is just a concept, one of many ideas to verify what is happening around us - one in many interpretations. We do not know how it really is, but we cannot consider the Age of the Universe from the point of view of our Here and Now. There and Then - surely "time" passed differently - more peculiarly?
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz