Age of the universe

The Age of the Universe may be quite different. According to the Big Bang theory, the age of our Universe has been estimated at 13.799 ± 0.021 billion years. Recent revelations Scientists at the University of Ottawa have recently found that the Universe may be up to twice as old as thought.

This would explain, among other things, why galaxies observed by the James Webb Space Telescope, which are calculated to have existed 300 million years after the Big Bang, look as if they are several billion years old. Research into the age of the universe has been going on for years, and as a result it seemed to be well known by now. Pictures of young galaxies that look "old" are changing this picture. "The age of the Universe thus remains a mystery".

According to the Big Bang theory, there was nothing before the beginning of the formation of the Universe. Everything began at the point of "Singularity." It was from the "Singularity" that it freed up space in which matter could stably exist. If there was still no space at the point of "Singularity", there was also no stable matter.

This means that there were no physical quantities that could describe the point of the "Singularity." From the moment of release from the "Singularity" of space, the expansion of space takes place. Thus, the expansion of space is manifested by the distancing of Galaxies from each other and the release and transformation of Physical constant and consequently physical quantities.

If at the moment when Space was freed by the point of "Singularity" there may not have been any physical quantities, how to describe the beginning of the Universe? Hardly, if even one of these physical quantities was "disturbed" - did not resemble its definition, which we use in our Here and Now, then all the other physical quantities could also be in an unstable state.

This means that they were not suitable for the Description of the Universe at the time of the "release" of Space from the point of "Singularity". At the point of "Singularity" was "Time" understood from the point of view of our Here and Now, or also "Time" like Space was freed and is expanding - subject to expansion?

The description of the Universe, like Space and Time has expanded - certainly transformed to the point of our Here and Now. Originally, perhaps, Space and Time had their own paths of development to eventually merge into our Here and Now and reveal themselves as a new quality in the description of the Universe - Spacetime.

This means that the process of transformation of physical quantities is still being sustained. The description of the Universe of our Here and Now will be transformed to our Tomorrow. Perhaps Tomorrow will be the next release (International System of Units) of our tools for tomorrow's description of the Universe? It is also consistent to ask about the Age of the Universe.

The age of the Universe may therefore turn out to be quite different if the objects we observe are apparent objects. These objects exist through information that has been reaching us for billions of years. Thus, if we observe an estimated 350 billion phantom objects, then perhaps the information about these objects that has reached us sequentially according to the direction of the Universe’s expansion may give a completely different answer to the question of the Age of the Universe.

Let's return to the expansion of the Universe according to the Big Bang theory. Is the Expansion of the Universe about "adding" more areas of "Space"? Does the Expansion consist in "stretching" the already existing "Space"? How is this accomplished? We can also consequently ask and what happens in the process of Expansion of the Universe with "Time"? Is "Time" also subject to expansion in the Universe, if so, it is possible that the Age of the Universe should be seriously revised. So, does our Theory of Everything (ToE) bring us closer to another description of the World?