The gravity of the moment may be causing some confusion in the existing perception of Reality.

The gravity of the moment may be causing some confusion in the existing perception of Reality. It seems the time has come to ask the question: Is gravitational interaction related to time? In other words, is there only Gravity of the moment. So, can Gravitational Interaction from our past and from our future affect our present moment? If Gravity from the “past” and from our “future” could influence the gravitational interaction in our “present” moment, could there then be a cumulative gravitational interaction? See more about our concept of Gravity.

Accumulation of gravitational interaction, could take place in the case when mass/matter from our “past” or from our “future” would be in a stable state. Then we would experience any mass/matter through observation. Unfortunately, but humans can only experience mass/matter in a stable state in the present moment. No one is able to experience mass/matter from the “past” or the “future.” For some reason, a separation is made between our “past” and our “future”. This separation, is the result of loss of information. That is, stable mass/matter loses some of its information and consequently, such mass/matter loses its stability in the next moment of time.

Gravity of the moment. Gravitational interactions occur only in our present moment. We are not in contact with gravitational interactions from our “past” and gravitational interactions from our “future.” Gravity could then accumulate. The case of Accumulation of Gravity from all moments could be interpreted as the interior of a Black Hole. In such places Gravity has a huge impact. It is likely that the interior of a Black Hole may contain stable mass/matter from different moments of our time, so there may be an accumulation of Gravity for mass/matter from the “past” as well as from the “future.” The accumulation is illustrated at the end of the sequence of our animation as a collection of all images of our Planet Earth.

Thus, information is the basis for a consistent flow from the conventional “past” to the present moment. In other words, what was, now is obsolete from our point of view, because it has lost some information for its stabilization in that past moment. Therefore, cumulative gravitational interaction is not possible - we would then experience the cumulative gravity of such an object (mass/matter) from its “past” and from its “future”. At that time, this would mean that a person could observe every moment of time - from the beginning of the existence of our Universe until its End - for example, the Heat Death of the Universe.

The Present Moment is the point of contact between our “past” and our “future.” There is no way to stop the mass/matter that existed in our “past.” In each subsequent present moment of time, our observed mass/matter already has completely different properties, State of matter and sometimes chemical composition.

Even the photon that brought information to us from the “past” has taken information about our present moment and will deliver it to the “future.” Otherwise, to clarify - the photon from the “past” will no longer be the same photon in our present moment. The photon will take the information a the present state and carry it to the “future moment”. The information, however, will be partially degraded in the “future.”

Therefore, it can be assumed that our photon changes over time (see Uncertainty of matter). These changes, are necessary because every time a photon bounces off some elementary particle, it then receives a portion of information about such a phenomenon. Its properties are then changed as a result of the intake of information.

This information, will be delivered to the next moment to build the present Reality - a stable picture of matter at the present point of time and space. Thus, if our elementary particle - the photon, carries information from the “past” to the “future”, then it may turn out that once upon a time, our Universe contained completely different information necessary to build the present Reality.

Gravity of the moment. At the beginning of the creation of our Universe, there was neither time, nor space, nor energy, and there was no matter. After the appearance of time and then space, there was the possibility of energy and then matter. Everything could resemble the process of evolution. Thus, every feature necessary to describe the Universe must have evolved. It seems, then, that the world of elementary particles must also have evolved. If this could have been the case, then at the beginning of our Universe there were elementary particles that were not endowed with the properties we know today. This would mean that in the beginning a photon could have had its mass information, and later it could have lost it. Each feature could have appeared with subsequent evolution. Gravity could also have appeared after the release of elementary particles and fundamental forces.

If the photon changes as a result of Information, it could mean that information determines our present Reality. So if information is necessary to determine the sequence of events, then information determines our  concept of „Time”. The concept of “time” can then determine Gravity, and therefore the Gravity of the moment is accomplished. Gravity is therefore dependent on time. This means that we are dealing with Gravity at a given moment - this is the Gravity of the moment.

The basis, then, is information. If information is the determinant of the construction of our actual present moment, it means that everything can be subject to information. Gravity, matter, mass, energy and time too. Information therefore determines the shape of our Reality - perhaps the shape of our Universe. Information is contained in all aspects of our Universe - from the beginning of its creation until our Universe collapses.

Gravity is most accurately described by the general theory of relativity, proposed by Albert Einstein in 1915, which describes gravity not as a force, but as the curvature of spacetime, caused by the uneven distribution of mass, and causing masses to move along geodesic lines. The most extreme example of this curvature of spacetime is a black hole, from which nothing — not even light — can escape once past the black hole's event horizon.

Cosmological constant (usually denoted by the Greek capital letter lambda: Λ), alternatively called Einstein's cosmological constant, is a coefficient that Albert Einstein initially added to his field equations of general relativity. Einstein's cosmological constant was abandoned after Edwin Hubble confirmed that the universe was expanding. From the 1930s until the late 1990s, most physicists agreed with Einstein's choice of setting the cosmological constant to zero. That changed with the discovery in 1998 that the expansion of the universe is accelerating, implying that the cosmological constant may have a positive value.

Observations show that the expansion of the universe is accelerating, such that the velocity at which a distant galaxy recedes from the observer is continuously increasing with time. The accelerated expansion of the universe was discovered in 1998 by two independent projects, the Supernova Cosmology Project and the High-Z Supernova Search Team, which used distant type Ia supernovae to measure the acceleration.

The idea was that as type Ia supernovae have almost the same intrinsic brightness (a standard candle), and since objects that are further away appear dimmer, the observed brightness of these supernovae can be used to measure the distance to them. The distance can then be compared to the supernovae's cosmological redshift, which measures how much the universe has expanded since the supernova occurred; the Hubble law established that the further away an object is, the faster it is receding. But now, we have a big problem with the rate of expansion of the Universe.

Webb Telescope may have solved one of the biggest problems in science - the rate of expansion of the Universe

Ezzy Pearson

Published: September 11, 2024 at 2:39 pm

Some novel observations may have solved the mystery of why the expansion rate of the Universe appears to change depending on how you measure it. Astronomers assess the Universe’s expansion in two ways: by looking at radiation from the Big Bang, which gives a value of 67.4km per second per megaparsec; or from the motion of nearby galaxies, which gives 74km per second per megaparsec.

The rate of the expansion of the Universe changes depending on how you measure it, and this is known as the Hubble tension, named after Edwin Hubble, the American astronomer who in 1929 presented the first observational evidence that the Universe is expanding.

Edwin Hubble (1889 - 1953) was an astronomer who confirmed that other galaxies exist outside of the Milky Way. Photo by New York Times Co./Getty Images

How the Universe's expansion rate is measured

It’s unclear if the disagreement is because our assumptions about the Universe are wrong, or if it’s our measurements of galactic distances. Many astronomers believe the latter is the culprit. These measurements are made using standard candles, objects with a known intrinsic brightness. By comparing how bright they are with how they appear, we can determine their distance. To calibrate a ‘distance ladder’, we need to find galaxies that contain two or more different kinds of objects.

Where Webb comes in

Webb and Hubble images of Cepheid variable star P42. Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, Adam G. Riess (JHU, STScI)

This new study looked at two well-used methods: Cepheid variable stars whose variance is linked to their brightness; and low-mass stars, which have a fixed limit on how bright they are. Researchers also used a new method, looking at carbon stars that have a strong colour-to-brightness relationship in the near-infrared.

Using the James Webb Space Telescope, the team found eight galaxies that overlapped between these methods, which they used to measure a Hubble constant of 70km per second per megaparsec.

“Based on these new James Webb Space Telescope data and using three independent methods, we do not find strong evidence for a Hubble tension,” says Wendy Freedman from the University of Chicago, who led the study.

While the results are promising, the sample size is currently very small, so the team plan to look for more galaxies.  

“Getting good agreement from three completely different types of stars is a strong indicator that we’re on the right track,” says Freedman.

Sourse: https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/news/webb-telescope-solve-hubble-tension

Thus, if there are differences in estimates of the age of our Universe (the expansion of the Universe), it could mean that the information that is received by the James Webb Space Telescope must have degraded. Or perhaps we should say that this is how the information has evolved over time (see the Information Propagation). This could mean that what we manage to observe is outdated from our point of view. In other words, information from the “past” influences the construction of our present Reality, but for some reason we receive it in a modified shape. Just as Gravity from our past is modified and has a residual effect on our present moment.

Gravity of the Moment. Interpreting Gravitational Interaction for Our Here and Our Now. So, if our concept of “time” has a completely different meaning, how can this translate into the perception of the concept of Gravity? With this approach to the concept of “time”, one can assume that the common part of all interpretations - our Base Attributes: time, space, energy and matter, is one Attribute - INFORMATION. It is the Information of the Basic Attributes that can be the Transform for all other derived Attributes. This means that Gravity from the “Past” gets rid of a certain portion of Information, which is the ingredient to build our Present Reality. Gravity from the “past” thus loses the ability to directly affect our present Moment with Gravity.

What could all this mean? What is the interpretation of Gravity of the Moment? Gravity, then, must be related to “time.” It is time that determines the stability of matter. If matter is stable, it can interact with gravity. For each successive moment, the stabilization of mass/matter takes place and the stabilization of mass/matter from our “past moment” is extinguished. From our point of view, this means that Gravity can only interact in the present moment. The other moments have negligible gravitational impact because mass/matter from the “past” and from the “future” is not available in a stable form for the present moment.

If Gravity is time-dependent, then other properties could also be time-dependent. Then it would stand to reason that the Hubble constant could have different values. The Hubble constant describes the rate of expansion of the Universe as a function of time (but our concept of time has a different interpretation). The number of kilometers by which one megaparsec increases in one second [(km/s)/Mpc] is taken as the unit. It allows to estimate the age of the Universe to a good approximation, assuming the Friedman-Lemaître model as the cosmological model.

This means that the expansion of our Universe may have followed heterogeneous rules - perhaps even different laws of physics. These laws, with the passage of time, evolved to become our Laws of Physics. Perhaps the differences that appear in determining the age of our Universe are precisely related to the passage of time and the maturation of the Laws of Physics into the shape of the Laws that apply to our Here and Now. The basis, then, is the changing information that co-creates the surrounding Reality in our Now.

Marek Ożarowski