Creating Concept is like prompting in ChatGPT. You don't know anything, you don't know what to ask. You only know one thing, the Concept/Theory you create must be consistent. Consistency should not only apply to the Concept itself, but should also touch on the knowledge that applies today. Our Concept was also created similarly. We think we know where to start, but doubts still arise. Creating Concept is a hallucination. You think you know something, but it's just a kind of dream of something new - you don't know how to present it, but you feel it. And now what?
If you could have access to a brilliant computer that can answer any question. What would you ask? Would you be able to understand the answer you would get? Let's say we would manage to ask about the creation of our Universe. Would we be able to formulate our query well? Would the answer be just dry text, or perhaps some kind of illustration, or perhaps a projection of a movie that would show us the expected answer? Perhaps such an answer would only be a certain interpretation that refers to our knowledge, to our level of perception of Reality. What about in case we could not understand the answer we received?
Creating Concept - an artistic vision of the Big Bang generated by AI (CreatedbyAI). It seems that the generated image is just a hallucination of ChatGPT. This does not mean that ChatGPT has generated an image that satisfies us. It also does not mean that the generated image does not meet our satisfaction. It means that there is some subtle line, between meeting and not meeting our expectations. If this can be the case, then the answer, the vision of the creation of our Universe, may disappoint us - it may differ from our expectations.
Does our learning, knowledge affect the expectations of the knowledge searched for? Do we know what we would like to ask? It seems that proper preparation and adequate knowledge can help with the ability to ask the right question. The right knowledge can also prepare us for the rather unexpected answer we would get. The greater the knowledge, the greater the potential for an unexpected answer. Where do these conclusions come from?
Michel de Nostredame (December 1503 – July 1566), usually Latinised as Nostradamus, was a French astrologer, apothecary, physician, and reputed seer, who is best known for his book Les Prophéties (published in 1555), a collection of 942 poetic quatrains allegedly predicting future events.
In The Prophecies Nostradamus compiled his collection of major, long-term predictions. The first installment was published in 1555 and contained 353 quatrains. The third edition, with three hundred new quatrains, was reportedly printed in 1558, but now survives as only part of the omnibus edition that was published after his death in 1568. This version contains one unrhymed and 941 rhymed quatrains, grouped into nine sets of 100 and one of 42, called "Centuries"
Creating Concept. Nostradamus, portrait by his son Cesar, c. 1614, nearly fifty years after his death.
Many of Nostradamus's supporters believe his prophecies are genuine. Owing to the subjective nature of these interpretations, no two of them completely agree on what Nostradamus predicted, whether for the past or for the future. Many supporters do agree, for example, that he predicted the Great Fire of London, the French Revolution, the rise of Napoleon and of Adolf Hitler, both world wars, and the nuclear destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Nostradamus lived at a time when one could lose one's life for certain visions, concepts, Theories or predictions. However, the question is not whether such concepts, visions are dangerous to the creators, but whether one can clearly explain one's visions, concepts to other people. Exactly this can be traced to the example of Nostradamus. He could probably describe submarines and airplanes in his visions. Unfortunately, but from the point of view of people living at the time of Nostradamus, this may have been shocking, completely incomprehensible. Just “predicting the future” is already ridiculous. I recommend a short documentary on Nostradamus.
How these types of visions can contribute to building theories, concepts. From the point of view of people who lived at the time of Nostradamus, these types of visions had no chance of success in understanding. Other people, even the most educated, could not understand Nostradamus' visions. Although Nostradamus left some clues in his works, it is difficult to interpret even in our time. The concept, the vision of submarines, airplanes in the sixteenth century was of no interest to anyone, and for the creator of such visions, it could harm - they could even bring death to the creator of the vision.
So how does the Creation of Concepts affect the progress of humanity? Have the visions of Nostradamus helped us in our development. Or can such visions influence our present? Or can such visions teach us something? The creation of Concepts is probably connected with the “loneliness” of their creators. Each author of a Concept is left alone with such a concept. The author of the concept has to make the effort to explain his concepts. And no one is able to help him in these activities. Presentation of visions, views, own ideas and concepts is probably one of the most difficult things.
Each creator is left alone with his own concept, not only because it is his subjective view, but mainly because it “precedes” the people who live next to him. Nostradamus could not tell his visions about submarines to anyone else. Nor was he able to understand his visions fully - certainly the technology he saw in his visions was alien to him. The same is true of Concept Creation. The Concept Creator is on his own. He has to find the answer to every question to make his Concept coherent. The Concept Creator must constantly expand his knowledge to be able to find analogies to what he has created.
Creating Concepts is part of the creator, his intimate thoughts, visions that he wants to convey to others. That's why it's so difficult to convey what inspires emotion in us. We creators treat our Concepts, our visions, as our children. That's why we have an emotional relationship to them. Perhaps our explanations of these concepts are disturbed by our emotions. A concept always has its family and its “father.” Only some people do not want to acknowledge their children.
According to our conception, “time” does not exist, and if it does, then perhaps gravity has a completely different meaning as well. This led us to our concept of the Theory of Everything. This is just our proposal for more information see the links below:
Imagine a Theory of Everything – EVERYTHING. A theory that explains what is TIME, the COORDINATE of space, taste, hair color, the movement of planets, the Big Bang, Parallel Worlds and explains all your choices. A theory that explains why you have dreams and, at the same time, how matter was created. A theory that does not exclude what we know, what we have come to know but perhaps looks at things a little differently.
A theory that takes into account philosophy, mathematics, physics – Everything. A theory that bridges the worlds of physics and metaphysics. The theory that starts from wherever your perception, experience and imagination apply. You can’t go deeper, we are at the limits of abstraction.
It is an energy state that maps time, space, matter, the Universe…. and at any point in time – So does „time” exist? It is impossible to prove certain phenomena, we have problems with both the micro-world and the macro-world, what we present here is the boundary between Knowledge and Philosophy. Some claim that everything began with the Big Bang – we do not dispute this, but we look at it differently.
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz