czwartek, 19 grudnia 2024

Time counter

Time counter. How does time actually pass? What interpretation can a time counter have? We already know that our time is directional - it passes from the past to the future, according to its arrow of time. The direction of the passage of time also follows the direction of the Expansion of our Universe. If, in addition, we accept the assumption that our Universe is expanding inside the Root Cause - the Initial Singularity, the uncertainty of our understanding of "time" also appears from the point of view of the macro-world. If our time is uncertain, how can it be counted? Do we have T-symmetry? How will the Time counter be interpreted in this case?

Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle in the micro-world - in the world of elementary particles, introduces uncertainty for such parameters describing the particle as position and momentum. This can mean that, consequently, uncertainty in position and momentum is a result of uncertainty in time in the micro-world. Then our elementary particle can be in several places at one time. This means that "time" from our point of view retains its differences with "time" from the micro-world, and thus has its differences in lapse depending on where the observation is made. This means that "time counter" in mikro-world is not the same one in the macro-world.

Time counter. How does time actually pass?
Time counter. How does time actually pass? "Speed" of the expansion of the Singularity is marked with a green arrow - Vs. The value of the expansion of the Singularity is greater than the expansion of objects located inside the Singularity, this means that the inequality Vs > Ve occurs. Time on the outer layers of the Initial Singularity passes much faster than in places located closer to the Central Point of the Sphere of the Singularity. This means that our "time" slows down the closer we are to the center of the Sphere. There is an inequality TB > TO - where TB is the time of the Beginning and TO is our Time of the present moment. This means that there are many more "changes" occurring on the outer layers of the Sphere than in its central layers. The measure of "times" is change.

So is the Uncertainty of Time possible for the conditions so presented? Our Universe would have to expand in a completely different way - see link. From the illustration above, you can see that the Initial Singularity is expanding faster than any Universe that exists within the Sphere of the Initial Singularity. This means that the expansion rate of the Singularity Vs is greater than the expansion rate of our Universe Ve. This means that it is likely that our Universe will strive for the Center Point of the Singularity Sphere, but will never reach it. It will only move closer to the Center of the Sphere of Singularity. How will the Time counter be interpreted in this case?

Perhaps adopting such a model of the Initial Singularity as an expanding sphere can also justify the escape of Galaxies (Hubble's law) that are near the outer layers of the Sphere of the Singularity. This is discussed in the article in the link. What would our "Uncertainty of Time" consist of? If we trace the above illustration, we can see that the farther away from the Center of the Sphere of Singularity, the more "changes" there are, and this consequently means that "time" in these places must be accelerating. Here a certain paradox of time appears, which is precisely what can be described by the "Uncertainty of Time". How will the Time counter be interpreted in this case?

According to such a Concept of Root Cause, which forces the expansion of our Universe from the outer layers of the Sphere of Singularity in the direction to the Central Point, our concept of "time" keeps the same direction as the direction of the Expansion of our Universe. This means that the oldest objects we observe are located on the outer layers of the Sphere of Singularity. In this location, "time" flows much faster. Why might this be so, and how does this relate to the "Uncertainty of Time"?

If one accepts the logic of the Big Bang Theory, then certain parameters may have played a role in the first moments of the Universe (Chronology of the universe) - this is the so-called Planck epoch. Exactly what the course was is not known - it is a phase of development of the early Universe. Today, we can only seek knowledge about it with the help of Observational cosmology. It can be said of the Planck epoch that it began the creation of our Universe at time t = 0 and lasted until t = 10-43 s (seconds). Back then, Time counter had a different meaning, a different dimension.

However, if at that time our Universe was close to the outer layers of the sphere of the Singularity, time could have a different interpretation - it could have an unimaginably large lapse. This means that the period of the Planck epoch in fact did not last a fraction of a second and could have lasted billions of years from our perspective. How will the Time counter be interpreted in this case?

However, our Universe began its expansion, and with the expansion of the Singularity, "time" began to slow down. The more the Initial Singularity expanded, the more time on its territory, on its inner layers, slows down. This means that we are dealing with uncertainty here, it is the Uncertainty of Time. Therefore, if our Universe is heading to the Central Point of the Singularity, time will slow down. Time counter seems peculiar in such a situation.

Marek Ożarowski

 

Brak komentarzy:

Prześlij komentarz

Time counter

Time counter. How does time actually pass? What interpretation can a time counter have? We already know that our time is directional - it p...