AI support

I received a proposal - AI support. I do not create my content using AI (in addition to support in English translation) - such a procedure kills my creativity and I do not have permission for it. Do not go down this road, AI, ChatGPT will kill creativity in you. Failure to use such AI solutions will slowly cause our society to produce "cyber-idiots." We have a problem with AI support in education. A student creates "his" essay using ChatGPT and thus kills his ability to create. You can disagree with me is your individual approach to AI. Now everyone has to decide whether to become better and better or take the easy road with AI support.

We don't yet have some concrete, research, thoughts in the form of scientific papers on the coexistence of solutions from the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in combination with Education, Art. Bill Gates got excited in his blog over AI support when ChatGPT solutions to a very difficult academic test almost perfectly. But. Some areas of our professional life already see some problems. Problems with AI support?

From May 2 to September 27, 2023, the Writers Guild of America (WGA)—representing 11,500 screenwriters — went on strike over a labor dispute with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP). The 148-day strike was the longest interruption to American film and television production since the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the second longest labor stoppage that the WGA has performed since the strike of 1988, which lasted for 153 days. Along with the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike, which continued after the writers' strike ended, it was part of a series of broader Hollywood labor disputes...

One of the main focus points in the labor dispute is the residuals from streaming media; the WGA claims that AMPTP's share of such residuals has cut much of the writers' average incomes compared to a decade ago. Writers also wanted artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT, to be used only as a tool that can help with research or facilitate script ideas and not as a tool to replace them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Writers_Guild_of_America_strike

Perhaps after the precedent is set, more trade associations will step in. The issue is quite serious and not yet regulated by law. Solutions based on Artificial Intelligence were created to support us in our activities. To support us. But what about when solutions from the AI area will perform the "creative" process for us? The area of support was originally intended to address our tedious, repetitive activities, which had a disruptive effect on our creative process. Now, noticeably this boundary is being pushed - the support of AI solutions is encroaching on creative processes.

US authors George RR Martin and John Grisham are suing ChatGPT-owner OpenAI over claims their copyright was infringed to train the system... ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) "learn" by analysing a massive amount of data often sourced online. The lawsuit claims the authors' books were used without their permission to make ChatGPT smarter.

OpenAI said it respected the rights of authors, and believed "they should benefit from AI technology". Other prominent authors named in the complaint include Jonathan Franzen, Jodi Picoult and George Saunders. The case has been brought to the federal court in Manhattan, New York, by the Authors Guild, a trade group in the US working on behalf of the named authors. According to the filing, it accused OpenAI of engaging in "systematic theft on a mass scale".

A spokesperson for OpenAI said: "We're having productive conversations with many creators around the world, including the Authors Guild, and have been working co-operatively to understand and discuss their concerns about AI...

Patrick Goold, reader in law at City University, told BBC News that while he could sympathise with the authors behind the lawsuit, he believed it was unlikely it would succeed, saying they would initially need to prove ChatGPT had copied and duplicated their work.

"When we're talking about AI automation and replacing human labour... it's just not something that copyright should fix."What we need to be doing is going to Parliament and Congress and talking about how AI is going to displace the creative arts and what we need to do about that in the future."

The case is the latest in a long line of complaints brought against developers of so-called generative AI - that is, artificial intelligence that can create media based on text prompts - over this concern.

It comes after digital artists sued text-to-image generators Stability AI and Midjourney in January, claiming they only function by being trained on copyrighted artwork. And OpenAI is also facing a lawsuit, alongside Microsoft and programming site GitHub, from a group of computing experts who argue their code was used without their permission to train an AI called Copilot.

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-66866577

The above example is the "tip of the iceberg" of the problems waiting to be solved. At the moment, we are not able to consume all the possibilities offered by solutions based on Artificial Intelligence - neither mentally nor legally. We are running out of time to solve the legal aspects, and the unleashed Artificial Intelligence technology surprises us every day with new possibilities. And the Law? The law changes with every precedent - in a word, it cannot keep up with the changes in AI technology.

AI support cannot be held, AI support will be developed. The question is how? See more information about AI support in links (Technologia przed Prawem) and (Neuralink Czipowanie ludzi).